In question 1, we were asked to recall two equations from previous classes.
\frac{dP}{dr}=-\frac{GM_r\rho_r}{r^2}
\frac{dT}{dr}=-\frac{L_rk_B\rho_r}{16\pi r^2acT^3}
Pretty easy, right? Well, it gets harder.
Question 2 asked us to derive the equation for the relationship between mass and radius, \frac{dM}{dr}.
We wrote down the equation for the mass of an object, which is actually the rearranged equation for the density of an object.
M=\frac{4\pi r^3\rho_r}{3}
Then we found its derivative
\frac{dM}{dr}=4\pi r^3\rho_r
Still pretty easy to understand
Question 3 asked us to find the relationship between density and gas pressure.
Obviously, I saw the words "gas" and "pressure" and immediately thought of the ideal gas law
P=nk_BT
But, since the question wanted to include density, we had to find a way to put a \rho in the equation. Since \rho=n\bar{m}, the ideal gas law can be written as
P=\frac{\rho}{\bar{m}}k_BT
Question 5 asked us to rewrite the all of the relationships.
We were given that P_C\sim \frac{M^2}{R^4}.
\frac{dP}{dr}\sim \frac{P}{r}=-\frac{GM_r\rho_r}{r^2}*
If you substitute in the full equation for \rho and rearrange for P, you do in fact find that
P_C\sim \frac{M^2}{R^4}
Next we'll do the temperature-radius relationship.
\frac{dT}{dr}\sim \frac{T}{r}=-\frac{L_rk_B\rho_r}{16\pi r^2acT^3}
Again, if you substitute in for \rho and rearrange, you find
T^4\sim \frac{LM}{R^4}
Now, it's mass' turn.
\frac{dM}{dr}\sim \frac{M}{r}=4\pi r^3\rho_r
Substituting and rearranging gives you
\frac{M}{R}\sim\frac{M}{R}
which is so obvious that it's not actually helpful. So, the trick is not to substitute for \rho and you get
\rho\sim\frac{M}{R^3}
Question 6 asks us to summarize all the relationships found above by using power laws
a) R\sim M which you can find by simplifying the relationship found in Question 5
b) L\sim \frac{R^4}{M} but because of the relationship in part (a), we can rewrite this as L\sim M^3
c) L\sim \frac{M}{\rho} which makes sense because if a star isn't particularly massive, a dense star will be really small, and therefore not very luminous. If we do the substitution for \rho one last time, and we use the relationship from part (a), we find that L\sim M^5
e) For low-mass stars, we start with
L\sim M^2T^4
which is the from equation for the surface luminosity of a star.
But we can substitute using the mass-luminosity relation found in part (c) and get
L\sim L^{2/5}T^4
When you rearrange, you get
L\sim T^{20/3}
For massive stars, we once again start with
L\sim M^2T^4
but now we substitute the mass-luminosity relation in part (b)
L\sim M^{2/3}T^4
L\sim T^12
See? I told you it would get harder.
* You can say that $\frac{dP}{dr}\sim\frac{P}{r}$ because we assume that the initial pressure is 0 and the final pressure (the pressure at the surface) is not. So since we assume that dP=P(final)-P(initial), we can posit make that leap.
Hi Moiya,
ReplyDeleteNice work here, just a couple of issues. There is a mistake in part 2): there is a reason why the prompt is asking for an integral equation…
Also the problem asked to sketch the main sequence on an HR diagram using the relationships derived.