In question 1, we were asked to recall two equations from previous classes.
$\frac{dP}{dr}=-\frac{GM_r\rho_r}{r^2}$
$\frac{dT}{dr}=-\frac{L_rk_B\rho_r}{16\pi r^2acT^3}$
Pretty easy, right? Well, it gets harder.
Question 2 asked us to derive the equation for the relationship between mass and radius, $\frac{dM}{dr}$.
We wrote down the equation for the mass of an object, which is actually the rearranged equation for the density of an object.
$M=\frac{4\pi r^3\rho_r}{3}$
Then we found its derivative
$\frac{dM}{dr}=4\pi r^3\rho_r$
Still pretty easy to understand
Question 3 asked us to find the relationship between density and gas pressure.
Obviously, I saw the words "gas" and "pressure" and immediately thought of the ideal gas law
$P=nk_BT$
But, since the question wanted to include density, we had to find a way to put a $\rho$ in the equation. Since $\rho=n\bar{m}$, the ideal gas law can be written as
$P=\frac{\rho}{\bar{m}}k_BT$
Question 5 asked us to rewrite the all of the relationships.
We were given that $P_C\sim \frac{M^2}{R^4}$.
$\frac{dP}{dr}\sim \frac{P}{r}=-\frac{GM_r\rho_r}{r^2}$*
If you substitute in the full equation for $\rho$ and rearrange for P, you do in fact find that
$P_C\sim \frac{M^2}{R^4}$
Next we'll do the temperature-radius relationship.
$\frac{dT}{dr}\sim \frac{T}{r}=-\frac{L_rk_B\rho_r}{16\pi r^2acT^3}$
Again, if you substitute in for $\rho$ and rearrange, you find
$T^4\sim \frac{LM}{R^4}$
Now, it's mass' turn.
$\frac{dM}{dr}\sim \frac{M}{r}=4\pi r^3\rho_r$
Substituting and rearranging gives you
$\frac{M}{R}\sim\frac{M}{R}$
which is so obvious that it's not actually helpful. So, the trick is not to substitute for $\rho$ and you get
$\rho\sim\frac{M}{R^3}$
Question 6 asks us to summarize all the relationships found above by using power laws
a) $R\sim M$ which you can find by simplifying the relationship found in Question 5
b) $L\sim \frac{R^4}{M}$ but because of the relationship in part (a), we can rewrite this as $L\sim M^3$
c) $L\sim \frac{M}{\rho}$ which makes sense because if a star isn't particularly massive, a dense star will be really small, and therefore not very luminous. If we do the substitution for $\rho$ one last time, and we use the relationship from part (a), we find that $L\sim M^5$
e) For low-mass stars, we start with
$L\sim M^2T^4$
which is the from equation for the surface luminosity of a star.
But we can substitute using the mass-luminosity relation found in part (c) and get
$L\sim L^{2/5}T^4$
When you rearrange, you get
$L\sim T^{20/3}$
For massive stars, we once again start with
$L\sim M^2T^4$
but now we substitute the mass-luminosity relation in part (b)
$L\sim M^{2/3}T^4$
$L\sim T^12$
See? I told you it would get harder.
* You can say that $\frac{dP}{dr}\sim\frac{P}{r}$ because we assume that the initial pressure is 0 and the final pressure (the pressure at the surface) is not. So since we assume that dP=P(final)-P(initial), we can posit make that leap.
Hi Moiya,
ReplyDeleteNice work here, just a couple of issues. There is a mistake in part 2): there is a reason why the prompt is asking for an integral equation…
Also the problem asked to sketch the main sequence on an HR diagram using the relationships derived.